Both the parents blamed Hemraj for the murder. Bharati went out to inform the neighbors, then returned to the house and asked the Talwars if they wanted her to finish the household chores; they declined, and she went on to work in other households. The Talwars called their family and friends and told the security guard to call the police, and when police arrived at a.
In his police complaint Rajesh claimed that their missing servant Hemraj was the prime suspect, he repeatedly told the police to pursue Hemraj instead of wasting their time to look for other suspects and offered them 25, rupees to track Hemraj down.
Strangely, the Talwars were inside the house when the murder occurred, sleeping in their room, and claimed not to have heard a single sound during the murder. They claimed that they shut their door and the air conditioning unit muffled the sounds of bludgeoning and laceration. Rajesh had planned to give the camera to Aarushi on her birthday 24 May , but Nupur persuaded him to give it to her as an early birthday present.
Aarushi clicked several photographs with her family, with the last image clicked at pm. The internet router was last used at am, based on this the CBI inferred that Rajesh was online until that time. Aarushi is believed to have been killed between 12 and 1 am. This brings up another point: The internet router was turned off at a. At a. This implies that someone had an extra key, but who could it be?
A bottle of whiskey with bloodstains from both victims was discovered on the kitchen table. Home India News Entertainment. HT Insight. My Account. Sign in. Sign out. The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards. Tags: Sunday Story We need more sensitive and competent judges to deal with certain kinds of cases," he says.
Talwar shares how medical experts on behalf of the prosecution were completely self-contradictory and extraordinarily foolish, how the so-called experts were not aware of completely normal gynaecological occurrence and how all the evidence was destroyed by the investigators themselves. According to Talwar, what such cases and the ones that follow tell about the judiciary is really its crumbling state, where the only real debate possible is whether the justice system is going to collapse, or has already collapsed.
He argues that this whole business of appointing a fast-track court is nothing else but "sleight of hand". It soothes the public, says Talwar, adding "Every time there is an Aarushi, a Nirbhaya, a Jessica Lal, or a Priyadarshini Mattoo case, there is a hue and cry and the government orders the case to be set on the fast-track rails.
He is of the opinion that justice for women will not improve till the time there is an overall improvement in justice. A few months after the charges against the accused paedophile or rapist are drawn up, the man will be out on bail, and he will remain on bail for possibly a decade, during which period his name cannot be on any database because he has not yet been convicted," he says.
As a result of the delays in the judicial system, these paedophile rapists roam completely free, during long periods of delayed justice continuing to live wherever they want, possibly in an area full of young children playing in the park for instance, and preying on any other young child, being now better trained on how to avoid detection as a result of their court and jail experiences, he adds.
0コメント